DBFS/NFS/ CFS /ASM Topics
DBFS:
- Oracle Database 11g Database File System (DBFS). Common DBFS Problems and Solutions. Part II.
- Oracle Database 11g Database File System (DBFS). Common DBFS Problems and Solutions. Part I.
- Oracle Database 11g Database File System (DBFS) Is Not A Popular Topic. Yet.
- Oracle Database File System (DBFS). It’s Not An “Exadata Feature.” – Part I.
- DBFS related Webcast: https://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/written-works-and-presentations/ (scroll down for the entry entitled Oracle Exadata Storage Server Technical Deep Dive. Part IV.
NFS/CFS/ASM/Other:
- Staging Data For ETL/ELT? Flat Files Appear Magically! No, Load Time Starts With Transfer Time.
- Oracle’s Latest Filesystem Offering: Btrfs
- Mount Options for Oracle over NFS. It’s All About the Port.
- Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel Storage – Part I. Oracle Over NFS is Weird.
- Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel – Part II. What’s So Simple and Inexpensive About NFS for Oracle?
- Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel – Part III. Did I Hear EMC Say NAS?
- Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel – Part IV. SANs are Simple, RAC is Difficult!
- Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel – Part V. What About Oracle9i on RHAS 2.1? Yippie!
- Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel – Part VI. Introducing Oracle11g Direct NFS!
- Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel – Part VII. A Very Helpful Step-by-step Install Guide for RAC on NFS.
- Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle With Fibre Channel – Part VIII. After All, Oracle Doesn’t Support Asynchronous I/O On NFS!
- SAN Admins: Please Give Me Maximum Capacity From as Few Spindles as Possible!
- Oracle Over NFS Performance is Glacial but it Isn’t File Serving
- Combining ASM and NAS-Got Proof?
- SAN Array Cache and Filers Hate Sequential Writes
- Copying Files on Solaris. Slow or Fast, It’s Your Choice. Part I
- Copying Files on Solaris. Slow or Fast, It’s Your Choice. Part II
- Copying Files on Solaris. Slow or Fast, It’s Your Choice. Part III
- Standard File System Tools? We Don’t Need No Standard File System Tools!
- Testing Direct Versus Buffered UFS on Solaris 10 with Swingbench.
- Standard File Utilities with Direct I/O
- Oracle Direct I/O Brought to You By Deranged Monkeys
- Direct I/O Can Crash Dataguard. Tricky ORA-01031.
- DBWR with CIO on JFS2. Resource Starvation?
- What Performs Better, Direct I/O or Direct I/O? There is No Such Thing As a Stupid Question!
- NetApp OnTap GX–Specialized for Transaction Logging.
- Isilon Leads in Clustered Storage–Without Support for Oracle
- Scalable NFS Powered By Open Source Cluster Filesystems
- Clustered Storage Advancing
- Which Version Supports Oracle Over NFS? Oracle9i? Oracle10g? What about Oracle11g on Windows?
- Oracle 10.2.0.3 Patchset is Not Functional with Solaris SPARC 64-bit and Veritas Filesystem
- Analysis and Workaround for the Solaris 10.2.0.3 Patchset Problem on VxFS Files
- The 10.2.0.3 Patchset with VxFS Saga: An Example of Incorrectly Describing the Incorrectness
- Oracle over NFS. EMC and Network Appliance Truth Telling.
- EMC’s MPFSi for Oracle: Enjoy It While It Lasts, or Not.
- The Decommissioning of the Oracle Storage Certification Program
- Yes Direct I/O Means Concurrent Writes. Oracle Doesn’t Need Write-Ordering.
- Oracle Database on CAS, NAS, FCP. Your Choice. Why Not Some of Each?
- An Open Source Cluster Filesystems Performance Study
- Oracle RAC on ZFS. A ZFS to ASM Comparison.
- Defaults with Oracle Managed Files. Some OMF Trivia Too!
- Introducing the “Unstructured Data Administrator”.
- Yes Direct I/O Means Concurrent Writes. Oracle Doesn’t Need Write-Ordering.
- Oracle Espouses Tiered Storage. ASM Who?
- Gigabit Ethernet NFS is Not Sufficient for Oracle. Forget NAS, or Read On…
- Troubles with Oracle on NAS? Old Stuff Deployed?
Kevin Closson's Blog: Platforms, Databases and Storage 
10 Responses to “DBFS, FS, CFS, NFS, ASM Topics”