The Decommissioning of the Oracle Storage Certification Program

I’ve known about this since December 2006, but since the cat is out of the proverbial bag, I can finally blog about it.

Oracle has taken another step to break down Oracle-over-NFS adoption barriers. In the early days of Oracle supporting deployments of Oracle over NFS, the Oracle Storage Compatibility Program (OSCP) played a crucial role in ensuring a particular NAS device was suited to the needs of an Oracle database. Back then the model was immature but a lot has changed since then. In short, if you are using Oracle over NFS, storage-related failure analysis is as straight-forward as it is with a SAN. That is, it takes Oracle about the same amount of time to determine fault is in the storage—downwind of their software—with either architecture. To that end, Oracle has announced the decommissioning of the Oracle Storage Compatibility Program. The URL for the OSCP (click here , or here for a a copy of the web page in the Wayback Machine) states the following (typos preserved):

At this time Oracle believes that these three specialized storage technologies are well understood by the customers, are very mature, and the Oracle technology requirements are well know. As of January, 2007, Oracle will no longer validate these products. We thank our partners for their contributions to the OSCP.

Lack of Choice Does Not Enable Success
It will be good for Oracle shops to have even more options to choose from when selecting a NAS-provider as an Oracle over NFS platform.  I look forward to other players to emerge on the scene. This is not just Network Appliance’s party by any means. Although I don’t have first-hand experience, I’ve been told that the BlueArc Titan product is a very formidable platform for Oracle over NFS—but it should come as no surprise that I am opposed to vendor lock-in.

Oracle Over NFS—The Demise of the Fibre Channel SAN
That seems to be the conclusion people draw when Oracle over NFS comes up. That is not the case, so your massive investment in SAN infrastructure was not a poor choice. It was the best thing going at the time. If you have a formidable SAN, you would naturally use a SAN-gateway to preserve your SAN investment while reducing the direct SAN connectivity headaches. In this model deploying another commodity server is as simple as plugging in Cat 5 cabling, and mounting an exported NFS filesystem from the SAN gateway. No raw partitions to fiddle with on the commodity server, no LUNs to carve out on the SAN and most importantly, no FCP connectivity overhead. All the while, the data is stored in the SAN so your existing backup strategy applies. This model works for Linux, Solaris, HPUX, AIX.

Oracle over NFS—Who Needs It Anyway?
The commodity computing paradigm is so drastically different than the central server approach we grew to know in the 1990s. You know, one or two huge servers connected to DAS or a SAN. It is very simple to run that little orange cabling from a single cabinet to a couple of switches. These days people throw around terms like grid without ever actually drawing a storage connectivity schematic. Oracle’s concept of a grid is, of course, a huge Real Application Clusters database spread out over a large number of commodity servers. Have you ever tried to build one with a Fibre Channel SAN? I’m not talking about those cases where you meet someone at an Oracle User Group that refers to his 3 clustered Linux servers running RAC as a grid. Oh how I hate that! I’m talking about connecting, say, 50,100 or 250 servers all running Oracle—some RAC, but mostly not—to a SAN. I’m talking about commodity computing in the Enterprise—but the model I’m discussing is so compelling it should warrant consideration from even the guy with the 3-node “grid”. I’m talking, again, about Oracle over NFS—the simplest connectivity and storage provisioning model available for Oracle in the commodity computing paradigm.

Storage Connectivity and Provisioning
Providing redundant storage paths for large numbers of commodity servers with Fibre Channel is too complex and too expensive. Many IT shops are spending more than the cost of each server to provide redundant SAN storage paths since each server needs 2 Host Bus Adaptors (or a dual port HBA) and 2 ports in large Director-class switches (at approximately USD $4,000 per). These same servers are also fitted with Gigabit Ethernet. How many connectivity models do you want to deal with? Settle on NFS for Oracle and stick with bonded Gigabit Ethernet as the connectivity model—very simple! With the decommissioning of the OSCP, Oracle is making the clear statement that Oracle over NFS is no longer an edge-case deployment model. I’d recommend giving it some thought.

13 Responses to “The Decommissioning of the Oracle Storage Certification Program”


  1. 1 Noons January 17, 2007 at 9:16 pm

    another thing I can see as a consequence of more NFS use:
    the premium prices being charged for FC and associated switches coming down to Earth with a proverbial “thud”…

  2. 2 kevinclosson January 17, 2007 at 11:11 pm

    Noons,

    I think that drop is at the 24 port and less end…they’ll pull high prices for director-class switches for quite some time

  3. 3 Alex Gorbachev January 18, 2007 at 2:35 am

    That should be the good news indeed.
    btw, just got ORA-27054 – while reading your post. 🙂

  4. 4 kevinclosson January 18, 2007 at 2:52 am

    a 27054 is actually “upwind” of NFS, Alex… port-specific…

  5. 5 Alex Gorbachev January 20, 2007 at 3:58 am

    Kevin, just a funny coincidence so I couldn’t resist mentioning it! 😉

  6. 7 jeff October 21, 2011 at 8:50 am

    bob,

    updated link (if you care)

    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/features/availability/oscp-092136.html

    this stuff just won’t die, will it.

    Sigh

    Straight guy with the plastic eye


  1. 1 maol symbolisch » The Decommissioning of the Oracle Storage Certification Program Trackback on January 27, 2007 at 7:54 pm
  2. 2 Jengates Blog » Oracle over NFS - easier now…no more certification Trackback on February 3, 2007 at 3:55 am
  3. 3 Which Version Supports Oracle Over NFS? Oracle9i? Oracle10g? What about Oracle11g on Windows? « Kevin Closson’s Oracle Blog: Platform, Storage & Clustering Topics Related to Oracle Databases Trackback on August 11, 2007 at 4:41 pm
  4. 4 Databases are the Contents of Storage. Future Oracle DBAs Can Administer More. Why Would They Want To? « Kevin Closson’s Oracle Blog: Platform, Storage & Clustering Topics Related to Oracle Databases Trackback on July 14, 2009 at 3:27 pm
  5. 5 Debunking Oracle certification myths | Dirty Cache Trackback on February 26, 2014 at 7:30 am

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




DISCLAIMER

I work for Amazon Web Services. The opinions I share in this blog are my own. I'm *not* communicating as a spokesperson for Amazon. In other words, I work at Amazon, but this is my own opinion.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,986 other followers

Oracle ACE Program Status

Click It

website metrics

Fond Memories

Copyright

All content is © Kevin Closson and "Kevin Closson's Blog: Platforms, Databases, and Storage", 2006-2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kevin Closson and Kevin Closson's Blog: Platforms, Databases, and Storage with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

%d bloggers like this: