Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel – Part VIII. After All, Oracle Doesn’t Support Async I/O on NFS

In the comment section of my recent post about Tim Hall’s excellent NFS step-by-step Linux RAC install Guide, Tim came full circle to ask a question about asynchronous I/O on NFS. He wrote:

What do you set your filesystemio_options init.ora parameter to when using Oracle over NFS?

Based on what you’ve written before I know NFS supports direct I/O, but I’m struggling to find a specific statement about NFS and asynchronous I/O. So should I use:




My reply to that was going to remind you folks about my recent rant about old Linux distributions combined with Oracle over NFS.  That is, the answer is, “it depends.” It depends on whether you are running a reasonable Linux distribution. But, Tim quickly followed up his query with:

I found my answer. Asynchronous I/O is not supported on NFS:

Bummer, I didn’t get to answer it.

Word To The Wise
Don’t use old Linux stuff with NAS if you want to do Oracle over NFS. Metalink 279069.1 provides a clear picture as to why I say that. It points out a couple of important things:

1. RHEL 4 U4 and EL4 both support asynchronous I/O on NFS mounts. That makes me so happy because I’ve been doing asynchronous I/O on NFS mounts with Oracle10gR2 for about 16 months. Unfortunately, ML 279069.1 incorrectly states that the critical fix for Oracle async I/O on NFS is U4, when in fact the specific bug (Bugzilla 161362 ) was fixed in RHEL4 U3 as seen in this Red Hat Advisory from March 2006.

2. Asynchronous I/O on NFS was not supported on any release prior to RHEL4. That’s fine with me because I wouldn’t use any Linux release prior to the 2.6 kernels to support Oracle over NFS!

The Oracle documentation on the matter was correct since it was produced long before there was OS support for asynchronous I/O on Linux for Oracle over NFS. Metalink 279069.1 is partly correct in that it states support for asynchronous I/O on systems that have the fix for Bugzilla 161363 but it incorrectly suggests that U4 is the requisite release for that fix, but it isn’t—the bug was fixed in U3. And yes, I get really good performance with the following initialization parameter set and have for about 16 months:

filesystemio_options = setall

Manly Man Post Script
Always remember, the Manly Man series is tongue-in-cheek.  Oracle over NFS with Async I/O on the other hand isn’t.

9 Responses to “Manly Men Only Deploy Oracle with Fibre Channel – Part VIII. After All, Oracle Doesn’t Support Async I/O on NFS”

  1. 1 Tim Hall July 18, 2007 at 7:26 am

    Cool man! You are a total godsend!

    It’s so nice to be wrong, when it means things are actually better than you expected.

    I love this series of posts. I can see myself becoming a terrible fanboy. 🙂



  2. 2 kevinclosson July 18, 2007 at 2:48 pm


    That would be “Manly Fan”, wouldn’t it? 🙂

  3. 3 yavor July 19, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    Maybe “Fanly Fan” will be better?

  4. 4 Steven October 1, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    This post helped us considerably. Thanks Kevin.

  5. 5 Amir Hameed May 18, 2010 at 8:04 pm

    Hi Kevin,
    For high I/O throughput-type Oracle (10gR2) systems that are currently runing on FC on large SMP servers, would you recommend first upgrading to 11gR1 (for DNFS) and then moving to NFS?


    • 6 kevinclosson May 18, 2010 at 9:52 pm

      Hi Amir,

      Well, no, I would recommend the Database Machine. But, if you have to go with something other than DBM, I would most certainly recommend going to 11gR2 if you are making the FC->NFS jump. I’d also take a good close look at the Sun Unified Storage platform with 10GbE …particularly the 7400

      Click to access 039224.pdf

  6. 7 Amir Hameed July 30, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    Hi Kevin,
    For systems configured with dNFS, What should ‘filesystemio_options’ be set to?


  1. 1 Technology Short Take #20 - - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers Trackback on January 20, 2012 at 2:48 am

Leave a Reply to kevinclosson Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


I work for Amazon Web Services. The opinions I share in this blog are my own. I'm *not* communicating as a spokesperson for Amazon. In other words, I work at Amazon, but this is my own opinion.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 744 other subscribers
Oracle ACE Program Status

Click It

website metrics

Fond Memories


All content is © Kevin Closson and "Kevin Closson's Blog: Platforms, Databases, and Storage", 2006-2015. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Kevin Closson and Kevin Closson's Blog: Platforms, Databases, and Storage with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

%d bloggers like this: